何伟：六大因素驱动数字经济加速发展******
光明网讯（记者 雷渺鑫）当前，数字经济作为经济增长新的引擎和经济复苏的中坚力量，整体呈现出量质齐升的发展态势，并已逐步成为全球经济增长的关键动力。1月6日，由中国工信出版传媒集团主办，北京信通传媒·通信世界全媒体承办的“2023ICT行业趋势年会”在北京召开。中国信息通信研究院副总工程师何伟发表了题为《数字经济加速发展，构筑经济复苏的中坚力量》的主题演讲。
他表示，过去两个十年，我国数字经济发展实现量质齐升加速发展。未来十年，产业将在数字技术创新、基础设施建设、ICT产业发展、数据价值释放、数实经济融合、治理体系构建六方面持续发力，助推我国数字经济加速发展。
随着社会数字化转型的逐步深入，我国数字经济发展实现量的合理增长和质的有效提升，并加速转向深化应用、规范发展、普惠共享的新阶段，数字经济也由经济的组成部分转变为经济发展的引领力量。
“当前，我国数字经济正开启新十年的发展大幕，进入新一轮快速发展阶段。”何伟表示，预计到2023年，我国数字经济规模将超过52万亿元。未来五到十年仍然是数字经济发展的快速阶段，整体来看，数字经济将保持快速稳定的增长，而产业数字化同样也进入加速发展的轨道。并且随着工业数字化加速渗透，其与服务业数字化共同构成驱动数字经济发展的“双引擎”。
近年来，在经济下行压力加大的情况下，数字经济依然保持平稳快速增长，其作为国民经济的“稳定器”的作用日益凸显。针对如何为数字经济持续健康快速发展提供坚实保障，何伟表示，重点需要关注六个因素：
一是数字技术迭代创新，锻造数字经济核心驱动力。数字技术正处于系统创新和智能引领的重大变革期，数字核心技术领域竞争将更加激烈。
二是网络基础设施持续升级，夯实数字经济重要载体。通信网络迈向高速全光，协同与智能助力发展。
三是ICT产业持续发展，成为数字经济先导力量。
四是数据价值持续释放，打造数字经济关键要素。当前，我国数据资源化阶段已经形成了比较完备的产业体系，而数据的资产化和资本化还处在探索中，技术应用、市场流通、制度设计三措并举正推动数据要素价值释放。
五是融合发展不断深入，构建数字经济主战场。数字化转型支出成为推进数字技术与实体经济融合的重要动力，转型支出持续扩张。
六是治理体系加速构建，筑牢数字经济重要保障。当前，与数字化发展相适应的数字治理制度体系框架基本形成，围绕竞争、数据、算法相关的制度规则将加速健全；数字市场监管将步入常态化，专注创新和竞争力打造将是赢得未来的核心。同时，全球数字治理新规则将持续塑造，新议题不断涌现。
中新网评：处理核污水绝不是日本自家私事******
中新网北京1月19日电(蒋鲤)日本政府近日称，将于2023年春夏期间开始向海洋排放经过处理的福岛第一核电站核污水。日本罔顾国内民众及周边国家的屡屡反对，企图将核污水“一倒了之”，把一件关乎全球海洋生态环境和公众健康的事当成了自家私事。
资料图：日本福岛第一核电站。2011年，福岛核电站事故发生后，大量放射性物质泄漏到大气层和太平洋，对周围环境造成了难以逆转的伤害，数十万人被迫撤离该地区。时至今日，作为日本邻国之一的韩国仍未解除福岛海鲜禁令。
日本以核污水存储能力即将达到上限为由，在2021年4月13日，正式决定将福岛第一核电站核污水排入太平洋。过去一年多，日本政府和东京电力公司一直在持续推进核污水排海计划。
日本政府辩称，这些核污水经多核素处理系统(ALPS)处理后很安全，甚至“可以喝”，这样的表态无疑在愚弄大众。
事实上，经过处理的核污水仍含有多种放射性物质，核污水一旦排放入海就无法回收，长期来看，将会给海洋生态带来难以估量的潜在威胁，最终危害人类健康。
因此，核污水排海计划推出后，遭到日本民众强烈反对。日本《朝日新闻》2022年3月公布的问卷调查显示，福岛县、宫城县和岩手县受访的42个市町村长中，约六成反对东京电力公司福岛第一核电站核污水排放入海。日本全国渔业协会联合会也多次申明立场，反对该计划。
日本政府认为，核污水排海是最便宜、最省事的解决方案，但此举却将周边国家乃至全世界置于核污染风险中。太平洋非日本一家之海，核污水会随着洋流流动，其影响势必会跨越国界，危害周边国家乃至整个国际社会的公共福祉和利益。
《韩国经济新闻》发文称，相关研究认为，福岛核污水如果排放入海，约7个月后将到达济州等韩国海域，该国水产业和旅游业将遭受相当大的损失。
德国南极海洋机构也曾发出警告，若日本将所有核污水排入海中，不到半年，整个太平洋都将面临高度辐射威胁，包括远在大洋另一端的美国。太平洋地区人民更是对日本该计划持反对意见。
日本作为《联合国海洋法公约》缔约国，有义务保护海洋环境。然而，在核污水排海方案的正当性、核污水数据的可靠性、净化装置的有效性、环境影响的不确定性等问题上，日本未能作出科学、可信的说明。
国际原子能机构技术工作组虽已三次赴日实地考察评估，但尚未就日排海方案的安全性给出结论，并且对日本提出诸多澄清要求和整改意见。在此情况下，日本仍执意推进核污水排海工程建设，这是极不负责任的行为。
太平洋不是日本的下水道，日本必须正视各方合理关切，在与周边国家等相关利益方和国际原子能机构充分协商后，制定合理的核污水处理方案。日本也要着眼长远，若只顾眼前，执意将核污水排放入海，不仅其自身，周边国家乃至全世界都将为之买单，其后果必将会危害数代人。
Fukushima water disposal by no means Japan’s own business
By John Lee
(ECNS) -- Japan has announced it will release treated wastewater from the wrecked Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Plant into the Pacific Ocean this year.
Although Fukushima wastewater disposal affects global marine ecological environment protection and public health, Japan has turned a deaf ear to domestic and international opposition to dumping the contaminated water into the sea, treating the "global" matter as its own business.
The Fukushima accident in 2011 had sent large quantities of radiation into the atmosphere and the Pacific Ocean, causing irreversible damage to the surrounding environment, and hundreds of thousands of people were forced to evacuate the area. South Korea still maintains its import ban on Japanese seafood from areas affected by the Fukushima nuclear disaster.
On April 13, 2021, Japan announced it had decided to discharge contaminated radioactive wastewater in Fukushima Prefecture into the sea due to dwindling storage space, with the Japanese government and plant operator Tokyo Electric Power Company Holdings Inc. promoting the release plan over the past year.
The Japanese government argues that the water treated by an advanced liquid processing system, or ALPS, is safe and drinkable, which is undoubtedly fooling the public.
In fact, the treated wastewater still includes a variety of radioactive substances and can’t be recycled once discharged into the sea, which will pose a great threat to marine ecology and ultimately endanger human health in the long run.
Therefore, the discharge plan has been strongly opposed in Japan. According to a questionnaire conducted by The Asahi Shimbun, nearly 60 percent of mayors of 42 municipalities in Iwate, Miyagi and Fukushima prefectures oppose the discharge plan. The National Fisheries Cooperative Federation of Japan has also repeatedly stated its opposition in public.
The Japanese government believes that dumping Fukushima wastewater into the sea is the cheapest and most convenient solution, but neighboring countries and even the whole world will be at risk of nuclear pollution.
The Pacific Ocean doesn’t belong to Japan and the wastewater flow along oceanic currents will surely break boundaries and endanger public welfare and the interests of neighboring countries and even the international community.
The Korea Economic Daily reported that related research concluded that if contaminated water from Fukushima is released into the ocean, it would only take seven months for the contaminated water to reach the shores of Jeju Island, with the country's aquaculture and tourism suffering considerable losses.
According to the calculation of a German marine scientific research institute, radioactive materials will spread to most of the Pacific Ocean within half a year from the date of discharge, and the U.S. and Canada will be affected by nuclear pollution. People in the Pacific region also oppose the discharge plan.
As a participant of the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea, Japan has the obligation of protecting the marine environment.
However, it hasn’t offered a full and convincing explanation on issues like the legitimacy of the discharge plan, the reliability of data on the nuclear-contaminated water, the efficacy of the treatment system or the uncertainty of environmental impact.
Though the IAEA has yet to complete a comprehensive review after three investigations in Japan, the Japanese side has been pushing through the approval process for its discharge plan and even started building facilities for the discharge. It is rather irresponsible for Japan to act against public opinion at home and concerns abroad.
The Pacific Ocean is not a private Japanese sewer. The country must seriously heed the voices of the international community and make a reasonable plan for the Fukushima wastewater disposal after full consultation with stakeholders and international agencies.
If it only seeks instant interest and insists on discharging the contaminated water into the sea, not only itself, but also its neighboring countries and the entire world will pay for the decision and several generations will be forced to bear the consequence.
| 彩云网地图 |
